The Evidence on Teaching

Genes Influence Young Children’s Human Figure Drawings and Their Association With Intelligence a Decade Later

Arden R, Trzaskowski M, Garfield V, Plomin R · 2014

grade Btwin-adoptionindependentunreplicated
Sample
7,752 twin pairs (drawing at age 4 in 7,437 pairs; g at 4 in 7,231 pairs; g at 14 in 2,348 pairs)
Population
Twins Early Development Study, England and Wales births 1994-96
Design
Classical twin design on the Draw-a-Child test (McCarthy 1972, 0-12 points for depicting head, eyes, nose, mouth, ears, hair, body, arms, legs, hands, feet and clothing; interrater reliability .93, alpha .79). The only genetically informative study of drawing ability located. It says nothing about instruction, which is precisely why it belongs here: it establishes that the trait an art curriculum would be trying to move has a heritable component and is genetically entangled with general ability a decade later.
Key findings
Drawing at age 4 is 29% heritable [.22, .35], almost exactly matching g at age 4 (.29 [.27, .32]); g at 14 is 50% heritable [.38, .61]. Drawing at 4 correlates .33 with g at 4 and .20 with g at 14, and the GENETIC correlation between drawing at 4 and g at 14 is .52 [.31, .75]. The authors' summary: "Individual differences in this widespread behavior have an important genetic component and a significant genetic link with g", and they note being "intrigued to find that scores for a single drawing were as heritable as was g estimated from several different indicators." The shared-environment component for drawing is non-trivial - reported around .26 - which is where any family or teaching input would sit, though the study does not measure instruction.
Genetic confound
This source is the confound quantified for visual art. Any cross-sectional comparison of children who do and do not take art classes is contaminated by a trait that is 29% heritable at age 4 and genetically correlated with later general ability at .52.
Replication notes
No replication of the drawing-g genetic correlation located. The heritability estimate is a single-cohort UK finding; the variance components reported in secondary extractions do not sum cleanly to 1.0 (A = .36, C = .26, E = .51 appear to mix trivariate and univariate model outputs), so those specific components should be verified against the paper's own tables before being relied on.

Effects

OutcomeMetricValueMeasureTimingVsHorizonClass
Heritability of children's human figure drawing at age 4a2 (classical twin design)0.29 (95% CI 0.22-0.35); for comparison g at 4 is 0.29 (0.27-0.32) and g at 14 is 0.50 (0.38-0.61)standardizedage 4nonenot-applicabledomain-skill
Phenotypic correlation between drawing at 4 and intelligencerdrawing@4 with g@4 r = .33 (.32-.35), n = 14,050; drawing@4 with g@14 r = .20 (.17-.22), n = 4,622standardizedages 4 and 14noneover-2yrg
Genetic correlation between drawing at 4 and intelligence at 14rg0.52 (95% CI 0.31-0.75) - the same genes influence early drawing and later general abilitystandardizedten-year intervalnoneover-2yrg

Cited by