The Evidence on Teaching

Twin-sibling study and meta-analysis on the heritability of maximal oxygen consumption

Schutte NM, Nederend I, Hudziak JJ, Bartels M, de Geus EJC · 2016

grade Bmeta-analysisindependentreplicated
Sample
479 twins/sibs (112 MZ, 109 DZ pairs); meta n=1,088 across 7-8 studies
Population
Dutch adolescent twins (16-18) and siblings (12-25); meta pools twin cohorts of children and adults
Design
Maximal graded cycle ergometer test plus two submaximal prediction protocols; the 72% figure is restricted to directly measured VO2max. C could be dropped without loss of fit throughout.
Key findings
Measured VO2max h2 = 60% [47-69] in ml/min and 55% [43-64] in ml/min/kg. Meta-analytic weighted h2 = 59% [52-66] (ml/min) and 72% (ml/min/kg, measured only). All pooled studies converge on absence of detectable shared environment: household does not explain aerobic capacity variance.
Genetic confound
Classical twin design, equal-environments assumption. Adolescents are co-resident, so shared environment should be maximally detectable here, yet is absent.

Effects

OutcomeMetricValueMeasureTimingVsHorizonClass
Directly measured VO2max, absoluteh2 (twin-sib)60% (95% CI 47-69%)standardizedadolescence, single maximal testnonenot-applicablehealth
Directly measured VO2max, per kg body massh2 (twin-sib)55% (95% CI 43-64%)standardizedadolescencenonenot-applicablehealth
Pooled VO2max heritability across cohortsweighted h2 (meta)59% (95% CI 52-66%) ml/min; 72% ml/min/kg for measured VO2maxstandardizedpooled, childhood to adulthoodnonenot-applicablehealth
Shared environmental variance (C) in aerobic capacityC varianceno detectable C in any included studystandardizedpoolednonenot-applicablehealth

Cited by