The Evidence on Teaching

Brain Gym: Building Stronger Brains or Wishful Thinking?

Hyatt KJ · 2007

grade Dreviewindependentnot-applicable
Sample
Review of the theoretical foundations and the associated peer-reviewed research on Brain Gym / Educational Kinesiology
Population
School children; Brain Gym is marketed for use in over 80 countries
Design
Reviews both halves of the claim - the posited mechanism (hemispheric integration, cross-lateral movement, 'brain buttons') and the empirical record. Full text was paywalled at SAGE; the abstract was obtained from ERIC (EJ758895) and the paper's conclusions are recorded at that level of detail only, which is why no effect sizes appear below.
Key findings
A review of the theoretical foundations of Brain Gym and of the associated peer-reviewed research studies FAILED to support the contentions of its promoters. Educators are urged to become informed consumers of research and to avoid programmes with neither a credible theoretical nor a sound research basis.
Genetic confound
Not applicable; the problem is absence of credible evidence rather than confounded evidence.

Effects

OutcomeMetricValueMeasureTimingVsHorizonClass
Empirical support for Brain Gym claimsqualitative verdictnot supportedunknownn/aunclearnot-applicablefar-transfer

Cited by