Does civic education for young people increase political participation? A systematic review
Manning N, Edwards K · 2014
grade Creviewindependentnot-applicable
Sample
6,890 titles screened; 9 studies met inclusion criteria
Population
Young people in civic education programmes across the studies reviewed, principally in Western democracies.
Design
Systematic review with pre-defined inclusion criteria and independent double screening of titles and abstracts across social science and education databases. Graded C, not higher, because it aggregates a very small and heterogeneous pool - nine studies of highly variable design quality - so it inherits their weaknesses. Campbell's 2019 review makes exactly this criticism and cautions against treating it as definitive; that is fair, but the criticism cuts both ways, since the reason the pool is small is that the primary literature is thin. READ DEPTH CAVEAT: read at abstract level via the publisher record and the York repository entry, plus Campbell's 2019 quotation of its conclusion.
Key findings
Little evidence that civic education has a clear effect on voting or registering to vote; modest positive effects on forms of political EXPRESSION such as signing petitions. Campbell quotes the operative sentence: 'the results indicate little evidence for civic education having a discernible or direct effect on voting or voter registration/enrolment'. The expression-not-voting split is the same pattern Pelkonen 2012 found under a much cleaner design in Norway (petitions moved, turnout did not), which makes it more than a review artefact.
Genetic confound
Medium to high, inherited. A review of nine mostly weak designs inherits their confounding; but the finding is a NULL, and confounding in this literature runs in the direction of overstating civic-education effects, so the null is if anything conservative.
Replication notes
A systematic review with a stated protocol rather than a narrative survey, so it is not itself replicable in the trial sense. Its conclusion has since been reproduced by two independent designs - Jung and Gopalan 2024 (state civics-test mandates, difference-in-differences) and Weinschenk and Dawes 2022 (transcript coursework, family fixed effects) - both nulls on turnout.
DOI / URL
10.1080/00131911.2013.763767
Effects
| Outcome | Metric | Value | Measure | Timing | Vs | Horizon | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting / registering to vote | narrative synthesis of 9 included studies | little evidence of a discernible or direct effect | mixed across included studies (mostly self-report) | varies | unclear | unclear | behaviour |
| Political expression (e.g. signing petitions) | narrative synthesis | modest positive effects | mixed across included studies (mostly self-report) | varies | unclear | unclear | behaviour |
Cited by
- Does civic education produce civic knowledge, and does civic knowledge produce civic behaviour?mixedconf: mediumgc: low