The Evidence on Teaching

A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9

Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. · 2019

grade Dreviewindependentnot-applicable
Sample
55 empirical studies
Population
K-9 students learning Scratch.
Design
A narrative systematic review organised by the three-dimension computational-thinking framework of concepts, practices and perspectives. No control groups, no effect sizes, no synthesis of causal designs. Read at abstract depth.
Key findings
Documents that K-9 students do acquire computational concepts through Scratch — sequences, loops, events, conditionals — and practices such as abstracting, modularising and debugging. This is a DOMAIN-SKILL review, not a transfer review, and it is important precisely for that reason: the well-evidenced part of the Scratch literature is that children learn Scratch. It is routinely cited in policy documents as though it evidenced cognitive transfer; it does not address transfer at all.
Genetic confound
Not applicable — no controlled comparisons.
Replication notes
A narrative review; nothing to replicate.
DOI / URL
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607

Effects

OutcomeMetricValueMeasureTimingVsHorizonClass
Acquisition of computational concepts and practices via Scratchqualitative synthesisconsistently documented across 55 studiesmixedpost-instructionnoneend-of-treatmentdomain-skill

Cited by