A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9
Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. · 2019
grade Dreviewindependentnot-applicable
Sample
55 empirical studies
Population
K-9 students learning Scratch.
Design
A narrative systematic review organised by the three-dimension computational-thinking framework of concepts, practices and perspectives. No control groups, no effect sizes, no synthesis of causal designs. Read at abstract depth.
Key findings
Documents that K-9 students do acquire computational concepts through Scratch — sequences, loops, events, conditionals — and practices such as abstracting, modularising and debugging. This is a DOMAIN-SKILL review, not a transfer review, and it is important precisely for that reason: the well-evidenced part of the Scratch literature is that children learn Scratch. It is routinely cited in policy documents as though it evidenced cognitive transfer; it does not address transfer at all.
Genetic confound
Not applicable — no controlled comparisons.
Replication notes
A narrative review; nothing to replicate.
DOI / URL
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
Effects
| Outcome | Metric | Value | Measure | Timing | Vs | Horizon | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition of computational concepts and practices via Scratch | qualitative synthesis | consistently documented across 55 studies | mixed | post-instruction | none | end-of-treatment | domain-skill |
Cited by
- Does teaching programming actually teach programming — and does the method matter?moderate supportconf: mediumgc: low