The Evidence on Teaching

Same Same, but Different? Relations between Facets of Conscientiousness and Grit

Schmidt FTC, Nagy G, Fleckenstein J, Moller J, Retelsdorf J · 2018

grade Ccritiqueindependentreplicated
Sample
Two German samples, N = 413 (mean age 15.3) and N = 530 (mean age 31.8)
Population
Germany; adolescents and adults.
Design
A psychometric test of the jangle-fallacy question using a hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of conscientiousness with grit facets extended into the model. All measures self-report. Method is entirely different from meta-analysis, which is why the convergence matters.
Key findings
Grit perseverance shares 95% of its variance with the common factors of conscientiousness. Consistency of interest shares 53% and additionally loads on the self-discipline facet. The authors conclude that grit and its facets can be fully integrated into the hierarchical structure of conscientiousness.
Genetic confound
Not applicable - a measurement-structure question.
Replication notes
Converges with Crede et al.'s meta-analytic rho = .84 and with Rimfeld et al.'s genetic correlation of .86 between grit perseverance and conscientiousness. Three methods, one answer.
DOI / URL
10.1002/per.2171

Effects

OutcomeMetricValueMeasureTimingVsHorizonClass
Variance grit perseverance shares with conscientiousness common factorsproportion95%researcher-designedcross-sectionalnonenot-applicablenon-cognitive
Variance consistency of interest shares with conscientiousnessproportion53%, plus loading on the self-discipline facetresearcher-designedcross-sectionalnonenot-applicablenon-cognitive

Cited by