Same Same, but Different? Relations between Facets of Conscientiousness and Grit
Schmidt FTC, Nagy G, Fleckenstein J, Moller J, Retelsdorf J · 2018
grade Ccritiqueindependentreplicated
Sample
Two German samples, N = 413 (mean age 15.3) and N = 530 (mean age 31.8)
Population
Germany; adolescents and adults.
Design
A psychometric test of the jangle-fallacy question using a hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of conscientiousness with grit facets extended into the model. All measures self-report. Method is entirely different from meta-analysis, which is why the convergence matters.
Key findings
Grit perseverance shares 95% of its variance with the common factors of conscientiousness. Consistency of interest shares 53% and additionally loads on the self-discipline facet. The authors conclude that grit and its facets can be fully integrated into the hierarchical structure of conscientiousness.
Genetic confound
Not applicable - a measurement-structure question.
Replication notes
Converges with Crede et al.'s meta-analytic rho = .84 and with Rimfeld et al.'s genetic correlation of .86 between grit perseverance and conscientiousness. Three methods, one answer.
DOI / URL
10.1002/per.2171
Effects
| Outcome | Metric | Value | Measure | Timing | Vs | Horizon | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance grit perseverance shares with conscientiousness common factors | proportion | 95% | researcher-designed | cross-sectional | none | not-applicable | non-cognitive |
| Variance consistency of interest shares with conscientiousness | proportion | 53%, plus loading on the self-discipline facet | researcher-designed | cross-sectional | none | not-applicable | non-cognitive |
Cited by
- Are self-control and grit teachable levers on achievement?mixedconf: highgc: medium