The Effect of Drama-Based Pedagogy on PreK–16 Outcomes
Lee BK, Patall EA, Cawthon SW, Steingut RR · 2015
grade Cmeta-analysisindependentreplicated
Sample
47 quasi-experimental intervention studies conducted since 1985; total N not obtainable
Population
PreK-16 students in drama-based pedagogy interventions
Design
The most-cited drama meta-analysis and the one usually quoted in arts advocacy. It is hard-paywalled and no repository copy exists, so this record carries an honest and unusual gap: the pooled effect size, its confidence interval, the per-domain estimates and the publication-bias analysis could NOT be obtained, and nobody should fill them in from memory. What is confirmed is the corpus (47 studies, all quasi-experimental, zero randomised trials) and the moderator pattern, both taken verbatim from the registered abstract. Grade C on the corpus description alone.
Key findings
From the registered abstract, verbatim: "A comprehensive search of the literature revealed 47 quasi-experimental DBP intervention studies conducted since 1985. The literature showed that designs were generally weak for making causal inferences and that outcomes other than achievement were infrequently studied. A meta-analysis of this research suggested that DBP has a positive, significant impact on achievement outcomes in educational settings. Effects were strongest when the intervention (a) was led by a classroom teacher or researcher rather than a teaching artist, (b) included more than five lessons, and (c) was integrated into English language arts or science curriculum compared to other domains. Positive effects across psychological and social outcomes were found." Note the self-indictment sitting inside the abstract of the field's flagship synthesis: the entire corpus is quasi-experimental and "generally weak for making causal inferences."
Genetic confound
Unmanaged - the corpus contains no randomised trial, so selection into drama programmes is uncontrolled throughout.
Replication notes
The teacher-versus-teaching-artist moderator reproduces in Lee, Enciso and Brown (2020) on an overlapping corpus (classroom teacher d = 0.89 versus teaching artist 0.31), as does the English-language-arts advantage. That later synthesis also supplies what this one does not - the measure-type moderator showing standardized tests give roughly a third of the effect of researcher-made ones.
Effects
| Outcome | Metric | Value | Measure | Timing | Vs | Horizon | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Achievement outcomes | pooled effect size | reported as "positive, significant" in the abstract; the numeric estimate, its confidence interval and any publication-bias correction could not be obtained from the paywalled article and are recorded as NOT FOUND rather than guessed | unknown | end of intervention | unclear | end-of-treatment | domain-skill |
| Moderators of the achievement effect | qualitative moderator ranking | effects strongest when led by a classroom teacher or researcher rather than a teaching artist, when more than five lessons were delivered, and when integrated into English language arts or science rather than other domains | unknown | end of intervention | unclear | end-of-treatment | domain-skill |
| Design quality of the corpus | count and qualitative verdict | all 47 studies quasi-experimental, none randomised; the authors state designs "were generally weak for making causal inferences" | unknown | not-applicable | unclear | not-applicable | unclear |
Cited by
- Does classroom drama build verbal and literacy skills?mixedconf: mediumgc: medium