Explore the evidence
2 of 88 decisions · clear everything
Survives the gold standardIndependent, durable, rigorousThe debunked shelfCheap winsFor parents at homeFamous numbers, deflatedWhere we admit ignoranceThe terrain
domain
- math6
- reading6
- writing6
- early childhood5
- assessment3
- debunked3
- health3
- homeschool3
- practice3
- character2
- grouping2
- instruction style2
- motor skills2
- arts1
- class size1
- computer science1
- curriculum1
- deliberate practice1
- edtech1
- feedback1
- foreign language1
- homework1
- mastery1
- physical development1
- school structure1
- sport1
- talent1
- teachers1
- time1
- transfer1
- tutoring1
confidence
layer
Your situation · from the applicability layer — absence means “not yet assessed,” never “doesn’t apply”
who's delivering
group / setting
outcome class
Growth-mindset interventions change beliefs almost everywhere and change achievement almost nowhere: the two independent national-scale trials measured standardized tests and found exactly zero.
mixedconf: highgc: low18/1829/48connected:FadeoutSystematic/explicit phonics vs whoTalent and trainabilityAre self-control and grit teachabl
Does teaching a growth mindset raise achievement? · character · ages 4–18
Executive function trains like a task, not like a capacity: gains are real, narrow, and gone at follow-up, EF curricula are null under independent trial, and the latent construct is ~100% heritable.
no effectconf: highgc: low21/2148/48connected:Does working-memory or brain trainHow should a school run its classrFadeoutTalent and trainability
Can executive function be trained, and does it transfer to learning? · character · ages 4–18
Not yet assessed for this question · 1
The URL is the state — any view you build here is a permalink you can hand to someone mid-argument.