Explore the evidence
1 of 88 decisions · clear everything
Survives the gold standardIndependent, durable, rigorousThe debunked shelfCheap winsFor parents at homeFamous numbers, deflatedWhere we admit ignoranceThe terrain
domain
- math6
- reading6
- early childhood5
- arts4
- health4
- science4
- debunked3
- practice3
- writing3
- character2
- grouping2
- history civics2
- homeschool2
- instruction style2
- motor skills2
- assessment1
- behavior1
- class size1
- computer science1
- curriculum1
- deliberate practice1
- feedback1
- mastery1
- physical development1
- practical1
- school structure1
- sport1
- talent1
- teachers1
- time1
- transfer1
- tutoring1
Your situation · from the applicability layer — absence means “not yet assessed,” never “doesn’t apply”
who's delivering
group / setting
outcome class
Life-skills courses reliably teach the content and rarely change the conduct; behaviour moves only where instruction sits close in time to the decision, and driver education is worse than nothing.
mixedconf: mediumgc: low11/1148/48
Do life-skills courses — money, cooking, driving, health — change what students actually do? · practical · ages 6–18
Not yet assessed for this question · 3
The URL is the state — any view you build here is a permalink you can hand to someone mid-argument.